Columbia Basin Herald

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Reader opposes Socialist values

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, September 21, 2012 9:00 am

The Socialist's mind worships the idea of Utopia. They live in the future, not in the now or the past. They never look back and own the Totalitarian chaos, deaths, imprisonments, tortures, starvations, poverty their failed Utopian idea creates when implemented. What counts is tomorrow. Yesterday's gone. Refine the idea and try harder!

Socialist preach about, the evil of the haves, the evil of the USA and colonialism, the evils of racism. Their Mantra's include Change! Hope! Moving Forward! Fundamental change! Sharing the riches! And they promise what they are going to do for you.

The Socialism ideal requires the dismantling of the economy and the government so it can be "transformed." The truth is that after the destruction there is only Totalitarian Rule, scarcity, suppression, and loss of personal freedom.

Obama can't look at the now and admit the chaos to our economy and our racial relationships his leadership and Socialist idea has caused so far. He is happy that his plan to "transform" America into a Socialist Utopia IS moving forward, just unfinished. And he is looking forward to another term in order to finish the job and do more to dismantle our economy, and implement the government take over of our energy resources, our food supply, our housing, and our personal riches to redistribute them so that we are all equal. This is what he calls, a "balanced" economy.

Obama's dreams of "hope and change" are possible because most of us do not understand what Socialism is and are unable see through the cover up. He says he is not a Socialist but his every action reveals that he is. I hope our citizens will make an effort to read and listen to find out what is hidden. Learn the buzz words the revolutionary uses that are the same ones Socialist/ Marxist have been using for decades and compare them to what you hear coming from Obama!

Our Country needs you this election cycle to stop the "Fundamental Change" of America Obama and his administration believe in. We have some great people running in this State and in the Presidential race. We need across the board support of conservative candidates so that we can turn the tide and get back on track. This is critical. If enough people sit this one out because their candidate did not get past the primaries Obama could get four more years to implement his Socialist policies. We do not need four years of Obama unleashed. It is up to all of us to stop that from happening. Your power is your vote! Vote for American, not Socialist values!

Vote Romney/Ryan. Vote Rob McKenna for Governor to get our state back on track. Vote Matt Manweller to represent you on the state level. Vote Doc Hastings to continue the fight in Congress and vote Mike Baumgartner to replace Marie Cantwell, Obama's water carrier, in the Senate.

Ann Mix

Moses Lake

  • Discuss

Welcome to the discussion.


  • oldwoman58 posted at 6:42 am on Tue, Oct 2, 2012.

    oldwoman58 Posts: 9

    There is no name calling, communist, socialist, a political bent, just like liberal and conservative. I did not get the information from fox and aor beck, I sighted the source for you.

  • Wild Bill posted at 9:22 pm on Mon, Oct 1, 2012.

    Wild Bill Posts: 76

    Oh, and I forgot to add this: It explains how Glenn Beck (big surprise, huh?) purposefully misconstrued the text book that you've been referring to as "Holdren's book." Politifact (a non-partisan organization that evaluates the truth of political claims) gave it a rating of "pants on fire."

    ANY Fox news is too much.

  • Wild Bill posted at 7:00 pm on Mon, Oct 1, 2012.

    Wild Bill Posts: 76

    Would you please make up your mind about why Obama's folks are evil? Last week you implied that his cabinet was rife with communists. Now they're eugenicists or animal rights activists. Next week, who knows what you'll be calling them. The point here (and the last one I'm making) is that you aren't consistent in your criticisms. These aren't dangerous socialists. They are people who may or may not be aligned with a number of political positions with which you disagree--hardly a surprise since they're liberal and you're conservative. However, the name-calling has to stop. It doesn't get the discussion any further, especially since most of it is blatantly false.

    You really don't see the difference between being "the author" and being "one of three authors?" I think there's a world of difference there. And I've seen the sections in question. They simply do not "support" those ideas. They describe them. If I said "Hitler argued that homosexuals need to be exterminated" that doesn't mean I support the idea. Again, read the book, not some Fox jockey's flawed description of it.

    See you around!!

  • oldwoman58 posted at 4:22 pm on Mon, Oct 1, 2012.

    oldwoman58 Posts: 9

    Animal abuse and suing are two different things. And yes, I did copy and paste which is why I gave the name of the website. You should go to the sight, it introduces 17 or 18 people that Obama has running rule over us, we should all be concerned if we like our freedom, they are bent on taking more of it away from us.
    Being the third author of a book still qualifies the person as an author, his book. "Support" means agrees with and/or believes the same How is that a lie?

  • Wild Bill posted at 1:27 pm on Mon, Oct 1, 2012.

    Wild Bill Posts: 76

    Boy, that spoon-fed misinformation really sticks with you, doesn't it? On Sunstein--he once argues in a paper that a person should be able to sue another person on behalf of an animal if that animal were abused. Not too different from concepts we currently use related to animal abuse. On Holdren (and please cut and paste more carefully--people might think you don't understand the arguments you're mindlessly reposting) he was third author on a book that described these possibilities. Saying that "his booK" (which it isn't) "advocates" (which it doesn't) these things is a blatant lie. Shame on you for spreading it. And no, I'm not going to the website you mention.

  • oldwoman58 posted at 12:19 pm on Sun, Sep 30, 2012.

    oldwoman58 Posts: 9

    Excuse you, I don't watch much Fox News, it is my choice over CBS, NBC, MSNBC, ABC and CNN.
    I did not say that I support medicare, unemployment or social security, reread what I did write. There might be parts of the healthcare plan that could help, I haven't read it myself. I am not a huge fam of Romney, I already said that. The reigning in, as you call it, is really limitations on the type of and duration of care that people are allowed to get. I would have to read it myself of coarse, but I highly doubt that fraud is dealt with much at all, most politicians in favor of controlling people are getting something out of the deal. Like the lawyers who sue the pants off of people/businesses, the house and senate refuse to address tort reform. OH! Maybe it's because a bunch of them are lawyers!
    The Regulatory Czar – Cass Sunstein,in favor of massive gun control, thinks animals should have the right to sue people.
    Science Czar – John HoldrenIn his book, Holdren advocates some of the most bizarre and horrifying policy stances imaginable. In the event of a “over-population crises,” Holdren supports “laws requiring compulsory abortion,” government confiscation of new born babies, the “development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin,” and, incredibly, “adding a sterilant to drinking water or stable foods….” as long a livestock would not be affected (as experimentally implemented in India). from the western center for jounalism
    Actually, go to the above website for starters, alot of info there.
    Anyone who would like to "fundamentally change America" should be considered dangerous. No matter what people believe in, the reason that people still want to come to America is because we are NOT like all other countries. Let's fight to keep it that way. (against democrats and/or republicans!)

  • Wild Bill posted at 3:34 pm on Sat, Sep 29, 2012.

    Wild Bill Posts: 76

    Well now you'll have to explain how you can simultaneously support medicare, unemployment and social security and oppose "socialist values." Seriously--quit watching Fox News. It's giving you bad information. Obama's health care plan is a logical extension of the other three programs mentioned, and a plan that Romney would support if it wasn't being suggested by a Democrat. That suggestion you make about doctors and pharmaceutical companies needing to be reigned in? It's in the health care plan. That's where that $716 billion savings that Romney was so angry about two months ago was coming from. Oh, and I looked for that "broad range of appointees." You're right. It consists of Van Jones, Van Jones, Van Jones, Van Jones, and of course, Van Jones.

  • oldwoman58 posted at 12:22 pm on Fri, Sep 28, 2012.

    oldwoman58 Posts: 9

    No, I am not saying that the people now receiving SS are leeches. The proposal from the right side of the isle is not to cut off people 55 and older and to reorganize how it is handle from here on out. Social Security is going broke, there are not enough people paying in to support the people who are in line to draw out. Unemployment is pretty much in the same boat...if you pay into it on pennies on the dollar, how in the world can you get 500+ dollars a week back for two and a half years and not expect it to run dry? Medicare also needs to be revamped, too much fraud, not just from people apllying but from doctors and pharma too.
    I would agree that he has the same values as Roosevelt, giant socialist/
    Watch the speech that Ronald Reagan gave at the 1964 Republican convention and tell me how he and Obama have the same values.
    Obama's broad range of appointees are admitted communist and socialist!

  • Wild Bill posted at 1:19 pm on Thu, Sep 27, 2012.

    Wild Bill Posts: 76

    Uhhh. . . no. She's not right for the most part. What's "happening to our country" includes such things as medicare, social security, unemployment insurance--things that even those who whine about socialism benefit from. Are you saying that those who contributed to Social Security and are now getting payments are selfish leeches? I sure hope not.

    Quite buying the lie. Obama is not a socialist. He supports certain values that were supported by Lincoln, Roosevelt, and even Reagan.

    Oh, and I've done the research. Minions? Try George W. Bush for that. He put far too many unqualified people into office. Obama has an excellent record of appointing a broad range of political perspectives to open positions.

  • oldwoman58 posted at 3:48 pm on Wed, Sep 26, 2012.

    oldwoman58 Posts: 9

    Ann is right for the most part. Anyone watching what is happening to our country knows this. It is the selfishness of people who want something for nothing at the expense of others that will not admit this.
    I am not a huge fan of Romney but I do believe that he wants to try to stop the destruction that is being done to the country. We only see a small fraction of what this administration is doing behind closed doors. Just look at the people around Obama and the minions that have been appointed to unelected offices.
    Do your own research flroadtrash and b3bear, don't just watch t.v.

  • flroadtrash posted at 3:12 am on Wed, Sep 26, 2012.

    flroadtrash Posts: 17

    romany hasn't got sense enough to roll a window down in a air-o-plane [beam]

  • flroadtrash posted at 3:10 am on Wed, Sep 26, 2012.

    flroadtrash Posts: 17

    oh no there's another faux nut [rolleyes]

  • b3bear posted at 9:50 am on Mon, Sep 24, 2012.

    b3bear Posts: 21

    Can I get some of what you are smoking? (it's not pot that is for sure)

    I suggest you turn off Fox News.